🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions reopen.

The US president last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet getting clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be active and continues the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi stated he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."